Comments on: Most Common Questions on Implementing BPM + SOA http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/most-common-questions-on-implementing-bpm-soa/ Insightful information on business process modeling from Rick Geneva Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:07:11 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Executive Jet Hire http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/most-common-questions-on-implementing-bpm-soa/comment-page-1/#comment-75 Executive Jet Hire Sat, 06 Jun 2009 23:35:35 +0000 http://www.rickgeneva.com/wp/?p=165#comment-75 I don’t normally comment on blogs but your post was a real call to action. Thank you for a great read. I don’t normally comment on blogs but your post was a real call to action. Thank you for a great read.

]]> By: Juan Cadavid http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/most-common-questions-on-implementing-bpm-soa/comment-page-1/#comment-74 Juan Cadavid Sat, 30 May 2009 05:00:27 +0000 http://www.rickgeneva.com/wp/?p=165#comment-74 Hi Rick, It's great how you show in this post the evolution of the past few years in the field. I got touched by the BPM/SOA hype when I was still at college and I even remember people talking about them separately and how different and unrelated they were. I wonder if anyone still thinks this way! Some specifications such as SCA have fortunately came in to let everyone know that BPM/SOA was not promising the "fire your IT staff" dream as MDA or other technologies did in the early 2000s, but they rather acknowledged the need for a descriptive component architecture to wrap up the software components we would still have to write with increasing complexity. It is just awesome to see how the common driver slowly turns away from the requirements document towards the process model; in some countries, such as here in Colombia, it's good to see them realize that BPM or SOA doesn't even require a big technology acquisition power, and see how they give more importance to their drawings than to their documents. Good times ahead! By the way, it was nice talking to you today! Hi Rick,

It’s great how you show in this post the evolution of the past few years in the field. I got touched by the BPM/SOA hype when I was still at college and I even remember people talking about them separately and how different and unrelated they were. I wonder if anyone still thinks this way!

Some specifications such as SCA have fortunately came in to let everyone know that BPM/SOA was not promising the “fire your IT staff” dream as MDA or other technologies did in the early 2000s, but they rather acknowledged the need for a descriptive component architecture to wrap up the software components we would still have to write with increasing complexity.

It is just awesome to see how the common driver slowly turns away from the requirements document towards the process model; in some countries, such as here in Colombia, it’s good to see them realize that BPM or SOA doesn’t even require a big technology acquisition power, and see how they give more importance to their drawings than to their documents. Good times ahead!

By the way, it was nice talking to you today!

]]> By: links for 2009-05-04 « steinarcarlsen http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/most-common-questions-on-implementing-bpm-soa/comment-page-1/#comment-59 links for 2009-05-04 « steinarcarlsen Mon, 04 May 2009 20:07:00 +0000 http://www.rickgeneva.com/wp/?p=165#comment-59 [...] Most Common Questions on Implementing BPM + SOA (tags: bpm soa bestpractice) [...] [...] Most Common Questions on Implementing BPM + SOA (tags: bpm soa bestpractice) [...]

]]>