<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Highlights from BPMN 2.0: Event Gateways</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/highlights-from-bpmn-2-0-event-gateways/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/highlights-from-bpmn-2-0-event-gateways/</link>
	<description>Insightful information on business process modeling from Rick Geneva</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Aug 2011 13:07:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Geneva</title>
		<link>http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/highlights-from-bpmn-2-0-event-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick Geneva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 03:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.processmodeling.info/?p=309#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Greg,
Good to hear from you, and thanks for your kind comments.  There&#039;s a lot of nice things about BPMN 2.0. There are many use cases now covered that were neglected before. Now the problem isn&#039;t so much how to create a diagram, but rather which way is the best, of the many options that will achieve the same results.  Subtle differences make all the difference in diagram interpretation, and process execution optimization.  My first round of blog posts is going to cover what&#039;s new in BPMN 2.0.  After this I plan on writing some more on the use cases and the problems that are solved.  The hardest part of the new spec is understanding what has changed.  There&#039;s a lot of new stuff in the diagrams, and I haven&#039;t even touched the mapping to BPEL yet.  

- Rick Geneva</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg,<br />
Good to hear from you, and thanks for your kind comments.  There&#8217;s a lot of nice things about BPMN 2.0. There are many use cases now covered that were neglected before. Now the problem isn&#8217;t so much how to create a diagram, but rather which way is the best, of the many options that will achieve the same results.  Subtle differences make all the difference in diagram interpretation, and process execution optimization.  My first round of blog posts is going to cover what&#8217;s new in BPMN 2.0.  After this I plan on writing some more on the use cases and the problems that are solved.  The hardest part of the new spec is understanding what has changed.  There&#8217;s a lot of new stuff in the diagrams, and I haven&#8217;t even touched the mapping to BPEL yet.  </p>
<p>- Rick Geneva</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Harley</title>
		<link>http://www.processmodeling.info/posts/highlights-from-bpmn-2-0-event-gateways/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Harley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 15:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.processmodeling.info/?p=309#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Rick,

I agree with your assertion about the event based inclusive gateway.
When adopted by BPM vendors, it will definitely simplify process triggers (be they intermediate or instantiation) based on a combination of received events.

Good job with the Blog by the way.

Cheers,
Greg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rick,</p>
<p>I agree with your assertion about the event based inclusive gateway.<br />
When adopted by BPM vendors, it will definitely simplify process triggers (be they intermediate or instantiation) based on a combination of received events.</p>
<p>Good job with the Blog by the way.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
Greg</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

